The Health and Environmental Affairs Subcommittee of the House Medical, Military, Public and Municipal Affairs Committee held a hearing on the investigational drug bill from Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus (R) on Wednesday. And while time constraints meant that members were not able to vote on the overall proposal, they did adopt an amendment from Rep. Krystle Matthews (D) that would add medical cannabis to the list of investigational treatment options that would be authorized under the broader legislation.<\/p>\n
Marijuana wasn\u2019t specifically included in the original bill, which is designed to give doctors the ability to treat patients with substances that are not currently approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in the event of an epidemic or pandemic declaration.<\/p>\n
\u201cI actually don\u2019t have a problem with people want to put other things in their bodies that may or may not be good for them if their doctors are saying that it may work,\u201d Matthews said at the subcommittee hearing. \u201cI do think there are other medicines\u2014but that, again, keeps running my mind back to medicinal marijuana.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMarijuana has over the years helped so many people and yet this state House has held it up because of all these frivolous issues with it not being researched and not being tested\u2014and yet here we have a bill in our hand. I\u2019m irritated because we have a bill in our hands that says, \u2018Oh now we want to be able to use something else even if it\u2019s not been approved.\u201d<\/p>\n
The subcommittee members ultimately accepted<\/a> the medical cannabis addition. The revised bill<\/a> is expected to move to the full committee for consideration, and it\u2019s the only panel in the Republican-controlled chamber that\u2019s chaired by a Democrat, with a majority of Democratic members.<\/p>\n \u2014 Advocates are pursuing broader reform in the South Carolina legislature this session, however.<\/p>\n A more targeted bill to legalize medical cannabis in the state officially passed the Senate on third reading last month, sending it to the House.<\/p>\n The Compassionate Care Act was prefiled in late 2020 and passed out of the Senate Medical Affairs Committee<\/a> last March, but a lone senator blocked it from reaching the chamber floor in 2021. Since then, the Davis redoubled his efforts to get the bill across the finish line, arguing that South Carolina voters are ready what he\u2019s repeatedly called \u201cthe most conservative medical cannabis bill in the country.\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n The senator said last month<\/a> that House Speaker Jay Lucas (R) agreed to \u201callow the bill to go through the House process\u201d if it advanced through the Senate, but a spokesperson for the speaker later told The Charleston Post and Courier that \u201cSen. Davis doesn\u2019t speak for Speaker Lucas.\u201d<\/p>\n Gov. Henry McMaster (R) said last month that it was too early to comment on the proposal, as changes were still being made by lawmakers. \u201cThis is one that\u2019s going to depend on a lot of things,\u201d he told<\/a> a local FOX station, adding that he\u2019ll wait to see the final version before deciding whether he would potentially sign or veto the bill if if were to arrive on his desk.<\/p>\n As amended and passed in the Senate, S. 150<\/a> would allow patients with qualifying conditions to possess and purchase cannabis products from licensed dispensaries. Smokable products, as well as home cultivation of cannabis by patients or their caretakers, would be prohibited. Simply possessing the plant form of cannabis could be punished as a misdemeanor.<\/p>\n Qualifying conditions for medical cannabis include cancer, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, glaucoma, Crohn\u2019s disease, sickle cell anemia, ulcerative colitis, cachexia or wasting syndrome, autism, nausea in homebound or end-of-life patients, muscle spasms, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Terminal patients with less than a year to live would also qualify. However, regulators would be authorized to add additional conditions in the future.<\/p>\n The bill would also allow access among patients with \u201cany chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition for which an opioid is currently or could be prescribed by a physician based on generally accepted standards of care,\u201d for example severe or persistent pain.<\/p>\n Medical marijuana would be subject to the state\u2019s six percent sales tax, and local jurisdictions would be able to levy an additional tax.<\/p>\n Rather than have conventional medical marijuana dispensaries that are in place in other legal states, the bill stipulates that there would be so-called cannabis pharmacies. The facilities would be required to have a pharmacist on site at all times, and the South Carolina Board of Pharmacy would promulgate business regulations.<\/p>\n People with felony-level drug convictions would also be prevented from participating in the new industry for a period of 10 years under the proposal.<\/p>\n In-state businesses would also receive licensing priority when the market in established, with the intent being to prevent multi-state operators from dominating the industry.<\/p>\n Under the bill, 75 percent of tax revenue after expenditures would go to the state\u2019s general fund, with another 10 percent going to drug use disorder treatment service providers, five percent going to state law enforcement, and the remainder going to cannabis research and drug education.<\/p>\n For the initial rollout, regulators would approve 15 cannabis cultivators, 30 processing facilities, a cannabis pharmacy for every 20 pharmacies in the state, five testing laboratories and four cannabis transporters. Lawmakers, rather than regulators, would be authorized to approve additional license types.<\/p>\n Local governments could ban medical cannabis businesses from operating in their jurisdictions under the amended bill, but otherwise the it says that local land use and zoning burdens \u201cshould be no greater for a cannabis-based business than for any other similar business.\u201d<\/p>\n The state Department of Health and Environmental Control would oversee licensing and other regulations of the new industry. A newly established Medical Cannabis Advisory Board would be in charge of adding or removing qualifying conditions. The board would meet at least once per year and be led by a governor-appointed chairperson.<\/p>\n Davis has championed medical marijuana in South Carolina since 2014, and at recent rally, he brought out a binder that he said contained eight years of research into the issue. He said he would use the information to \u201ctake on every single argument that has been raised in opposition to this bill, and I\u2019m going to show that they cannot stand in the way of facts and evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n He\u2019s also continued to push back against opposition to cannabis legalization from his own party, for example calling out an attack ad that was paid for by the South Carolina Republican Party.<\/p>\n The state GOP organization separately slammed a federal legalization bill<\/a> from U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican who represents South Carolina in Congress. And in January, cannabis opponents sent a mailer accusing Davis of wanting to turn the state into \u201cone big pot party.\u201d<\/p>\n A former White House chief of staff under President Donald Trump also recently called out his home state South Carolina Republican Party<\/a> for opposing the medical marijuana bill medical marijuana. Mick Mulvaney, Trump\u2019s top aide for more than a year and a former congressman, called the legislation \u201csomething that merits discussion and reasoned analysis,\u201d even if it\u2019s not a proposal that is conventionally considered a conservative priority.<\/p>\n Davis referred to the maneuvers by his own party as \u201cthe elephant in the room\u201d on the Senate floor as debate on the floor kicked off in January<\/a>, saying he was offended by the misinformation and planned to rebut every misleading claim the group made.<\/p>\n A poll released last February found that South Carolina voters support legalizing medical marijuana<\/a> by a five-to-one ratio. But the state does not have a citizen-led initiative process that has empowered voters in other states to get the policy change enacted.<\/p>\n Support for medical marijuana legalization among South Carolina residents has been notably stable, as a 2018 Benchmark Research poll similarly found 72 percent support for the reform, including nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of Republicans. Davis said last year that if the legislature didn\u2019t advance the reform, he\u2019d propose a bill to put the question of medical marijuana legalization to voters<\/a> through a referendum.<\/p>\n Also in 2018, 82 percent of voters in the state\u2019s Democratic primary election voted in favor of medical cannabis legalization<\/a> in a nonbinding ballot advisory vote.<\/p>\n Lawmakers prefiled four marijuana measures for the 2019 session<\/a>, but they did not advance.<\/p>\n
Marijuana Moment is already tracking more than 1,000 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills<\/a> in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters<\/a> pledging at least $25\/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don\u2019t miss any developments.<\/strong>![](\"https:\/\/thcinct.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/south-carolina-lawmakers-add-marijuana-access-to-investigational-drug-bill-as-house-considers-broader-reform-marijuana-moment.jpg\")
<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n
Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker<\/a> and become a supporter on Patreon<\/a> to get access.
\u2014<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
![](\"https:\/\/thcinct.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/south-carolina-lawmakers-add-marijuana-access-to-investigational-drug-bill-as-house-considers-broader-reform-marijuana-moment.png\")
<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"